Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO edgeDaVinci MIQRO
$99
Linx Apollo
$260
DaVinci MIQRO is typically around $161 lower.
VS
DaVinci MIQRO vs Linx Apollo
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
DaVinci MIQRO and Linx Apollo are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $161 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
13
Different Specs
13
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualDaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Close / ContextualDaVinci MIQRO
—
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualDaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
Linx Apollo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
Linx Apollo
$260
Heating Type
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
Linx Apollo
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO
170°C - 230°C
Linx Apollo
—
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO
~0.3g
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO
Removable 18350 battery
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO
—
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO
Micro USB
Linx Apollo
—
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO
~2 hours
Linx Apollo
—
Dimensions
DaVinci MIQRO
—
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Choose DaVinci MIQRO if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($99 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and conduction sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (13 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $99 | $260 |
| Heating Type diff | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~40 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | 170°C - 230°C | — |
| Chamber Capacity diff | ~0.3g | — |
| Battery Type diff | Removable 18350 battery | — |
| Battery Capacity diff | — | 2600mAh |
| Charging diff | Micro USB | — |
| Charge Time diff | ~2 hours | — |
| Dimensions diff | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight diff | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Digital Control | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Brand diff | DaVinci Tech | Linx Vapor |
Comparison FAQs
Is DaVinci MIQRO better than Linx Apollo?
Neither is universally better. DaVinci MIQRO fits some priorities, while Linx Apollo fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: DaVinci MIQRO or Linx Apollo?
DaVinci MIQRO is listed lower ($99) compared with Linx Apollo ($260), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between DaVinci MIQRO and Linx Apollo?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.