Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $110 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci IQC
DaVinci Tech $199
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
DaVinci IQC and XMAX QOMO are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $110 below DaVinci IQC. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
21%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $110 lower.
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
DaVinci IQC
3000mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
DaVinci IQC
92x45x25mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
DaVinci IQC
Digital Control
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Up to 221°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18650 battery | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 3000mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 92x45x25mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | ~160g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 5 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the DaVinci IQC is $199, a gap of about $110 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $199 for the DaVinci IQC, about $110 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci IQC takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DaVinci IQC has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
DaVinci IQC uses removable 18650 battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
DaVinci IQC controls heat with digital control, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. DaVinci IQC gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the DaVinci IQC.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.