Price (USD)
XMAX Daboo edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $150 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci IQC
XMAX Daboo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci IQC and XMAX Daboo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Daboo is usually the lower-cost pick at $49, around $150 below DaVinci IQC. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $150 lower.
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX Daboo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
DaVinci IQC
~160g
XMAX Daboo
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
XMAX Daboo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX Daboo
$49
Heating Type
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
XMAX Daboo
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX Daboo
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
XMAX Daboo
—
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
XMAX Daboo
—
Battery Capacity
DaVinci IQC
—
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
XMAX Daboo
—
Charge Time
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
XMAX Daboo
~1 Hour
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci IQC
No
XMAX Daboo
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $49 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | Up to 221°C | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | — |
| Battery Type | Removable 18650 battery | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | ~1 Hour |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 92x45x25mm | — |
| Weight | ~160g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Oven Type | Ceramic | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Water Cooling | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Daboo sits at $49 while the DaVinci IQC is $199, a gap of about $150 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Daboo is the cheaper option at $49 compared with $199 for the DaVinci IQC, about $150 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Only the XMAX Daboo supports concentrates out of the box. The DaVinci IQC is dry-herb-only by design.
DaVinci IQC controls heat with digital control, while the XMAX Daboo uses modular - 3 stages. DaVinci IQC gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Daboo fully charges in ~1 Hour, ahead of ~2 hours on the DaVinci IQC.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.