Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeBoundless CFX
$140
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Boundless CFX
Boundless Technology $140
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
Boundless CFX and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $40 below Boundless CFX. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
7
Overall Overlap
26%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Boundless CFX
$140
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $40 lower.
Boundless CFX
~30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Boundless CFX
Hybrid Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Boundless CFX
$140
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heating Type
Boundless CFX
Hybrid Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Temperature Range
Boundless CFX
100°C-221.1°C
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Battery Type
Boundless CFX
Internal
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
Boundless CFX
2500mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Charge Time
Boundless CFX
~30 minutes
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Dimensions
Boundless CFX
120x70x30mm
XMAX Starry V3
11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm
Power Adjustment
Boundless CFX
Digital
XMAX Starry V3
Digital (precise)
Brand
Boundless CFX
Boundless Technology
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX
Release Date
Boundless CFX
2016
XMAX Starry V3
2019
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Boundless CFX | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $140 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 100°C-221.1°C | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~30 minutes | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 120x70x30mm | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Boundless Technology | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Boundless CFX runs hybrid convection while XMAX Starry V3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Starry V3 is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $140 for the Boundless CFX, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Boundless CFX uses hybrid convection heating, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Starry V3 uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Boundless CFX has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Heat-up times are very close: ~30 seconds on the Boundless CFX and ~30 seconds on the XMAX Starry V3. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Boundless CFX fully charges in ~30 minutes, ahead of 90-120 minutes on the XMAX Starry V3.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Boundless CFX is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.