Price (USD)
Close callBoundless CFC 2.0
$90
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Boundless CFC 2.0
Boundless Technology $90
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
Boundless CFC 2.0 and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / discrete vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($90 vs $100). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
7
Overall Overlap
27%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Boundless CFC 2.0
$90
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Boundless CFC 2.0
~30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Boundless CFC 2.0
~85g
XMAX Starry V3
120g
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter listed unit.
Boundless CFC 2.0
Conduction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Boundless CFC 2.0
$90
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Temperature Range
Boundless CFC 2.0
60°C-230°C
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
Boundless CFC 2.0
~0.5g
XMAX Starry V3
0.3g
Battery Type
Boundless CFC 2.0
Swappable 18650
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Life
Boundless CFC 2.0
12-14 sessions
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charge Time
Boundless CFC 2.0
~3 hours
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Dimensions
Boundless CFC 2.0
130x33x30mm
XMAX Starry V3
11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm
Weight
Boundless CFC 2.0
~85g
XMAX Starry V3
120g
Power Adjustment
Boundless CFC 2.0
Digital
XMAX Starry V3
Digital (precise)
Brand
Boundless CFC 2.0
Boundless Technology
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Boundless CFC 2.0 | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 60°C-230°C | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | Swappable 18650 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | 12-14 sessions | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | 130x33x30mm | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | ~85g | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Brand | Boundless Technology | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 19 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Boundless CFC 2.0 has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus 0.3g on the XMAX Starry V3. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Boundless CFC 2.0 is the lighter unit at ~85g, around 35g less than the XMAX Starry V3 at 120g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Listed prices are close: $90 for the Boundless CFC 2.0 versus $100 for the XMAX Starry V3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Heat-up times are very close: ~30 seconds on the Boundless CFC 2.0 and ~30 seconds on the XMAX Starry V3. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
XMAX Starry V3 fully charges in 90-120 minutes, ahead of ~3 hours on the Boundless CFC 2.0.
Both devices support pass-through charging, so you can keep vaping while they're plugged in.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.