Price (USD)
XMAX Tunke edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX Tunke is typically around $200 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and XMAX Tunke are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Tunke is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $200 below AUXO Celsius. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX Tunke is typically around $200 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Tunke
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Tunke
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Tunke
$50
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
XMAX Tunke
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Tunke
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Tunke
—
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Tunke
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
XMAX Tunke
650mAh
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
XMAX Tunke
—
Power Adjustment
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
XMAX Tunke
Modular - 5 Stages
Oven Type
AUXO Celsius
Quarts
XMAX Tunke
—
Brand
AUXO Celsius
AUXO
XMAX Tunke
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (19 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | XMAX Tunke |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $50 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | 650mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | — |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Session Time diff | — | 15 seconds |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while XMAX Tunke fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX Tunke is listed lower ($50) compared with AUXO Celsius ($250), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.