Price (USD)
Utillian 722 edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
Utillian 722
$170
Utillian 722 is typically around $80 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius vs Utillian 722
AUXO Celsius
VS
Utillian 722
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
AUXO Celsius and Utillian 722 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Utillian 722 is usually the lower-cost pick at $170, around $80 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic Discrete
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Heating Style
Close callAUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Utillian 722
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
vs
Utillian 722
$170
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
vs
Utillian 722
Convection
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
vs
Utillian 722
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
vs
Utillian 722
2300mAh
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
Utillian 722
~60 minutes
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
vs
Utillian 722
Micro-USB
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
vs
Utillian 722
~2 hours
Power Adjustment
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
vs
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
Oven Type
AUXO Celsius
Quarts
vs
Utillian 722
—
Choose AUXO Celsius if...
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a hybrid (primarily conduction) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and hybrid sessions.
Choose Utillian 722 if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($170 vs $250).
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward convection sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
18 differ 1 shared
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $170 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 180°C - 225°C |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | ~2 hours |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - 5 stage |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Utillian |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | <0.4 grams |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Celsius and the Utillian 722?
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Celsius runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while Utillian 722 runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Which is cheaper, the AUXO Celsius or the Utillian 722?
Utillian 722 is the cheaper option at $170 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $80 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the AUXO Celsius or the Utillian 722?
AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the Utillian 722 takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 12 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Celsius and the Utillian 722?
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the Utillian 722 uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Can I use concentrates with the AUXO Celsius or the Utillian 722?
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The Utillian 722 is dry-herb-only by design.
Can I set custom temperatures on the AUXO Celsius or the Utillian 722?
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the Utillian 722 uses modular - 5 stage. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
Which charges faster, the AUXO Celsius or the Utillian 722?
AUXO Celsius fully charges in 1.5 hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the Utillian 722.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.