Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
PAX FLOW
$350
AUXO Celsius is typically around $100 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and PAX FLOW are both portable / hybrid vaporizers, but they target different priorities. AUXO Celsius is usually the lower-cost pick at $250, around $100 below PAX FLOW. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
PAX FLOW
$350
AUXO Celsius is typically around $100 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
PAX FLOW
$350
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
PAX FLOW
2000mAh (internal)
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
PAX FLOW
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
PAX FLOW
~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C)
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
Weight
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (22 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | PAX FLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $350 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Hybrid (conduction + convection) |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | 30-45 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.25g - 0.35g |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | 2000mAh (internal) |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) |
| Dimensions diff | — | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm |
| Weight diff | — | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Five petal modes + Bong Mode |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | PAX Labs |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Run Time diff | — | About 5-7 sessions per charge |
| Session Length diff | — | 8-minute timer |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while PAX FLOW fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
AUXO Celsius is listed lower ($250) compared with PAX FLOW ($350), but live retailer pricing can change.
AUXO Celsius has the faster listed heat-up time (6-30 seconds) versus PAX FLOW (30-45 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.