Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
PAX FLOW
$350
AUXO Celsius is typically around $100 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius vs PAX FLOW
AUXO Celsius
VS
PAX FLOW
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
AUXO Celsius and PAX FLOW are both portable / hybrid vaporizers, but they target different priorities. AUXO Celsius is usually the lower-cost pick at $250, around $100 below PAX FLOW. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
Portable Hybrid Electronic Discrete
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Weight
Close callAUXO Celsius
—
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close callAUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
vs
PAX FLOW
$350
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
vs
PAX FLOW
Hybrid (conduction + convection)
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
vs
PAX FLOW
30-45 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
PAX FLOW
180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
PAX FLOW
0.25g - 0.35g
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
vs
PAX FLOW
2000mAh (internal)
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
vs
PAX FLOW
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
vs
PAX FLOW
~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C)
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
PAX FLOW
107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm
Weight
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
PAX FLOW
135 grams
Choose AUXO Celsius if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($250 vs $350).
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a hybrid (primarily conduction) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction sessions.
Choose PAX FLOW if...
- You prefer a hybrid (conduction + convection) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward premium sessions.
- You prefer PAX FLOW's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
22 differ 1 shared
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | PAX FLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $350 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Hybrid (conduction + convection) |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | 30-45 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 180°C - 225°C (356°F - 437°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.25g - 0.35g |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2000mAh (internal) |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C) |
| Dimensions | — | 107mm x 34.5mm x 29mm |
| Weight | — | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Five petal modes + Bong Mode |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | PAX Labs |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Run Time | — | About 5-7 sessions per charge |
| Session Length | — | 8-minute timer |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Celsius and the PAX FLOW?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the AUXO Celsius sits at $250 while the PAX FLOW is $350, a gap of about $100 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the AUXO Celsius or the PAX FLOW?
AUXO Celsius is the cheaper option at $250 compared with $350 for the PAX FLOW, about $100 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the AUXO Celsius or the PAX FLOW?
AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the PAX FLOW takes 30-45 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Celsius and the PAX FLOW?
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the PAX FLOW uses hybrid (conduction + convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Can I use concentrates with the AUXO Celsius or the PAX FLOW?
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The PAX FLOW is dry-herb-only by design.
Can I set custom temperatures on the AUXO Celsius or the PAX FLOW?
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the PAX FLOW uses five petal modes + bong mode. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
Which charges faster, the AUXO Celsius or the PAX FLOW?
PAX FLOW fully charges in ~20 minutes to 50%, ~40 minutes to full (USB-C), ahead of 1.5 hours on the AUXO Celsius.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.