Price (USD)
Close callAUXO Celsius
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $260). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
—
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Linx Apollo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
Linx Apollo
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Linx Apollo
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
Linx Apollo
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
Linx Apollo
—
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
AUXO Celsius
—
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Power Adjustment
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | — |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Linx Vapor |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 19 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the AUXO Celsius versus $260 for the Linx Apollo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The Linx Apollo is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.