Price (USD)
Close callAUXO Celsius
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius
AUXO $250
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
AUXO Celsius and Linx Apollo are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $260). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Pricing is very close between both devices.
AUXO Celsius
157.8g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
Linx Apollo
$260
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
284°F - 500°F (140°C - 260°C)
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates
Linx Apollo
N/A
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
Lithium-ion
Linx Apollo
Internal
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
~9 sessions
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
114.1x45.1x33.3mm
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Weight
AUXO Celsius
157.8g
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $260 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 284°F - 500°F (140°C - 260°C) | 220°F - 428°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | N/A |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~9 sessions | ~10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | 3-4 hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 114.1x45.1x33.3mm | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | 157.8g | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | AUXO | Linx Vapor |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Body Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | — |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 23 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the AUXO Celsius versus $260 for the Linx Apollo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the Linx Apollo uses modular - 4 stages. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
AUXO Celsius lists a chamber capacity of 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates; the Linx Apollo lists N/A.
AUXO Celsius fully charges in 1.5 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
AUXO Celsius's spec sheet lists ~9 sessions; the Linx Apollo lists ~10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.