Price (USD)
Close callAUXO Celsius
$250
G Pen Hyer
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
G Pen Hyer
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and G Pen Hyer are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $250). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
G Pen Hyer
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
G Pen Hyer
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
G Pen Hyer
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
G Pen Hyer
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
G Pen Hyer
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
G Pen Hyer
—
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
G Pen Hyer
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
G Pen Hyer
~0.5g
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
G Pen Hyer
6000mAh
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
G Pen Hyer
2.5 - 3 hours
Power Adjustment
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
G Pen Hyer
Digital Control - 5 Stage Modular
Oven Type
AUXO Celsius
Quarts
G Pen Hyer
—
Brand
AUXO Celsius
AUXO
G Pen Hyer
Grenco Science
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | G Pen Hyer |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $250 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | — | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.5g |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 6000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | 2.5 - 3 hours |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Digital Control - 5 Stage Modular |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Grenco Science |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Display Type | — | LED Light User Interface |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | No |
| Heating Element | — | Stainless Steel |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Celsius runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while G Pen Hyer runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the G Pen Hyer uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the AUXO Celsius versus $250 for the G Pen Hyer. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The G Pen Hyer is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius fully charges in 1.5 hours, ahead of 2.5 - 3 hours on the G Pen Hyer.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the G Pen Hyer is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 21 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 19, an overlap of about 10%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.