Price (USD)
Flowermate CAP edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
Flowermate CAP
$75
Flowermate CAP is typically around $175 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and Flowermate CAP are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Flowermate CAP is usually the lower-cost pick at $75, around $175 below AUXO Celsius. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
Flowermate CAP
$75
Flowermate CAP is typically around $175 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
—
Flowermate CAP
90 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
Flowermate CAP
$75
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
Flowermate CAP
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Flowermate CAP
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Flowermate CAP
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
Flowermate CAP
196℃ to 215℃
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
Flowermate CAP
0.3 grams
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
Flowermate CAP
900mAh
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
Flowermate CAP
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
Flowermate CAP
1 hour
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
Flowermate CAP
30 x 93 x 20mm
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (21 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | Flowermate CAP |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $75 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 196℃ to 215℃ |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.3 grams |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | 900mAh |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | 1 hour |
| Dimensions diff | — | 30 x 93 x 20mm |
| Weight diff | — | 90 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - 3 stages |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | Flowermate |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while Flowermate CAP fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Flowermate CAP is listed lower ($75) compared with AUXO Celsius ($250), but live retailer pricing can change.
AUXO Celsius has the faster listed heat-up time (6-30 seconds) versus Flowermate CAP (~20 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.