Price (USD)
Close callAUXO Celsius
$250
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
$240
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius vs Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius
AUXO $250
VS
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Dr. Dabber $240
Editorial Summary
AUXO Celsius and Dr. Dabber Boost Evo are both conduction / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $240). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
29
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
Conduction Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close callAUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
~11 Seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo edgeAUXO Celsius
157.8g
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
2.8 oz
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo is the lighter listed unit.
Heating Style
Close callAUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
$240
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Desktop
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
~11 Seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
284°F - 500°F (140°C - 260°C)
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
500-750°F
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
Lithium-ion
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Internal
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
~9 sessions
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
<60 Uses
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
1-2 Hours
Weight
AUXO Celsius
157.8g
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
2.8 oz
Power Adjustment
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Modular - Six Stages
Choose AUXO Celsius if...
- You prefer a hybrid (primarily conduction) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and hybrid sessions.
- You prefer AUXO Celsius's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose Dr. Dabber Boost Evo if...
- You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates and desktop sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
26 differ 3 shared
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | Dr. Dabber Boost Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $240 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~11 Seconds |
| Temperature Range | 284°F - 500°F (140°C - 260°C) | 500-750°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~9 sessions | <60 Uses |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 114.1x45.1x33.3mm | — |
| Height | — | 7.75 inches |
| Weight | 157.8g | 2.8 oz |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - Six Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | AUXO | Dr. Dabber |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Body Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Diameter | — | 2.83 inches |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Celsius and the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. AUXO Celsius is a portable, Dr. Dabber Boost Evo is a desktop. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
Which heats up faster, the AUXO Celsius or the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo?
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo reaches session-ready temperature in ~11 Seconds, while the AUXO Celsius takes 6-30 seconds. That's roughly 7 seconds quicker on the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Celsius and the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo?
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Which is lighter, the AUXO Celsius or the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo?
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo is the lighter unit at 2.8 oz, around 78g less than the AUXO Celsius at 157.8g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Is the AUXO Celsius or the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo better for home versus on-the-go use?
AUXO Celsius is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Which is cheaper, the AUXO Celsius or the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo?
Listed prices are close: $250 for the AUXO Celsius versus $240 for the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Can I set custom temperatures on the AUXO Celsius or the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo?
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo uses modular - six stages. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.