Price (USD)
Close callAUXO Celsius
$250
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
$240
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and Dr. Dabber Boost Evo are both conduction / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $240). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
$240
Pricing is very close between both devices.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
~11 Seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
—
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
2.8 oz
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
$240
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
~11 Seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
500-750°F
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
—
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
—
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
<60 Uses
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
1-2 Hours
Pass-Through Charging
AUXO Celsius
—
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
Yes
Height
AUXO Celsius
—
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo
7.75 inches
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | Dr. Dabber Boost Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $240 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~11 Seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 500-750°F |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | — |
| Battery Life | — | <60 Uses |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Height | — | 7.75 inches |
| Weight | — | 2.8 oz |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - Six Stages |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | Dr. Dabber |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Concentrates | — | Yes |
| Diameter | — | 2.83 inches |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 23 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Dr. Dabber Boost Evo reaches session-ready temperature in ~11 Seconds, while the AUXO Celsius takes 6-30 seconds. That's roughly 7 seconds quicker on the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Yes, only the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo supports pass-through charging. The AUXO Celsius has to finish charging before you can use it.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the AUXO Celsius versus $240 for the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The Dr. Dabber Boost Evo is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo uses modular - six stages. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Dr. Dabber Boost Evo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.