Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci IQC
$199
DaVinci IQC is typically around $51 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and DaVinci IQC are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci IQC is usually the lower-cost pick at $199, around $51 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci IQC
$199
DaVinci IQC is typically around $51 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQC
~160g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci IQC
$199
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
DaVinci IQC
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
DaVinci IQC
—
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (24 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | DaVinci IQC |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $199 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | Up to 221°C |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | ~0.5g |
| Battery Type diff | — | Removable 18650 battery |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | — |
| Battery Life diff | — | ~1 hour |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | ~2 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | — | No |
| Dimensions diff | — | 92x45x25mm |
| Weight diff | — | ~160g |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Digital Control |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | Ceramic |
| Brand diff | AUXO | DaVinci Tech |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Heating Time diff | — | ~60 seconds |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while DaVinci IQC fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
DaVinci IQC is listed lower ($199) compared with AUXO Celsius ($250), but live retailer pricing can change.
AUXO Celsius has the faster listed heat-up time (6-30 seconds) versus DaVinci IQC (~30 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.