Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeAUXO Calent
$120
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $70 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Calent
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Calent and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $70 below AUXO Calent. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
32
Different Specs
31
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
3%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Calent
$120
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $70 lower.
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Calent
$120
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
AUXO Calent
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
AUXO Calent
2900mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
AUXO Calent
USB-C
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
AUXO Calent
2.5 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Width
AUXO Calent
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Calent | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 2900mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | — |
| Oven Type | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand | AUXO | — |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Concentrate Support | No | — |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 31 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $120 for the AUXO Calent, about $70 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of 2.5 hours on the AUXO Calent.
AUXO Calent is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.