Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeAUXO Calent
$120
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $31 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Calent
AUXO $120
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
AUXO Calent and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $31 below AUXO Calent. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Calent
$120
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $31 lower.
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Calent
$120
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Calent
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Calent
0.3g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
AUXO Calent
Lithium-ion
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
AUXO Calent
2900mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
AUXO Calent
~20 sessions
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
AUXO Calent
2.5 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
AUXO Calent
106.1x45x25mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Calent | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.3g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2900mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~20 sessions | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 106.1x45x25mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 134g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | No | Yes |
| Brand | AUXO | XMAX |
| Body Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Calent runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $120 for the AUXO Calent, about $31 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the AUXO Calent takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
AUXO Calent uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
AUXO Calent has the larger chamber at 0.3g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Only the XMAX QOMO supports concentrates out of the box. The AUXO Calent is dry-herb-only by design.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 2.5 hours on the AUXO Calent.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.