Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO edgeAUXO Calent
$120
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
DaVinci MIQRO is typically around $21 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Calent
DaVinci MIQRO
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Calent and DaVinci MIQRO are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $21 below AUXO Calent. AUXO Calent has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Calent
$120
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
DaVinci MIQRO is typically around $21 lower.
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
AUXO Calent has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Calent
$120
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
Device Type
AUXO Calent
Portable
DaVinci MIQRO
—
Heating Type
AUXO Calent
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Calent
~30 seconds
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Calent
—
DaVinci MIQRO
170°C - 230°C
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Calent
—
DaVinci MIQRO
~0.3g
Battery Type
AUXO Calent
—
DaVinci MIQRO
Removable 18350 battery
Battery Capacity
AUXO Calent
2900mAh
DaVinci MIQRO
—
Charging
AUXO Calent
USB-C
DaVinci MIQRO
Micro USB
Charge Time
AUXO Calent
2.5 hours
DaVinci MIQRO
~2 hours
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Calent | DaVinci MIQRO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 170°C - 230°C |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.3g |
| Battery Type | — | Removable 18350 battery |
| Battery Capacity | 2900mAh | — |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hours | ~2 hours |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital Control |
| Oven Type | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand | AUXO | DaVinci Tech |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g | — |
| Concentrate Support | No | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Calent runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while DaVinci MIQRO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
DaVinci MIQRO is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $120 for the AUXO Calent, about $21 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Calent reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the AUXO Calent, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
AUXO Calent uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the DaVinci MIQRO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
AUXO Calent controls heat with modular - 4 stages , while the DaVinci MIQRO uses digital control. DaVinci MIQRO gives you finer per-degree control.
DaVinci MIQRO fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of 2.5 hours on the AUXO Calent.
AUXO Calent is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the DaVinci MIQRO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.