Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
Atmos Jump and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $50). XMAX V3 Nano has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
30 seconds
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
Atmos Jump
~0.2g
XMAX V3 Nano
~0.1g
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Battery Life
Atmos Jump
~30-40 minutes
XMAX V3 Nano
5-6 sessions
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless steel |
| Brand | AtmosRx | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while XMAX V3 Nano runs hybrid (primarily convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX V3 Nano reaches session-ready temperature in 30 seconds, while the Atmos Jump takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 30 seconds quicker on the XMAX V3 Nano, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Atmos Jump has the larger chamber at ~0.2g, versus ~0.1g on the XMAX V3 Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $50 for the XMAX V3 Nano. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses none (fixed preset). Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of ~4 hours on the Atmos Jump.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.