Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Atmos Jump
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
29
Different Specs
29
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
Atmos Jump
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | Micro USB | — |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | — |
| Oven Type | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand | AtmosRx | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | ~0.2g | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 29 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $50 for the XMAX V3 Nano. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of ~4 hours on the Atmos Jump.
Atmos Jump is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.