Price (USD)
Close / ContextualAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Atmos Jump and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
29
Different Specs
29
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
Atmos Jump
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (29 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $65 | $50 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1200mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging diff | Micro USB | — |
| Charge Time diff | ~4 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions diff | 145x17mm | — |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular | — |
| Oven Type diff | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand diff | AtmosRx | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | ~0.2g | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Display Type diff | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time diff | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. Atmos Jump fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with Atmos Jump ($65), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.