Price (USD)
Atmos Jump edgeAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Atmos Jump is typically around $24 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Atmos Jump and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Atmos Jump is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $24 below XMAX QOMO. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Atmos Jump is typically around $24 lower.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Atmos Jump
~0.2g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Atmos Jump
~30-40 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | AtmosRx | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Atmos Jump is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $89 for the XMAX QOMO, about $24 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Atmos Jump takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Atmos Jump has the larger chamber at ~0.2g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of ~4 hours on the Atmos Jump.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.