Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX OONT
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Atmos Jump
XMAX OONT
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump and XMAX OONT are both discrete / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $50). XMAX OONT has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
18
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX OONT
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
XMAX OONT has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX OONT
$50
Device Type
Atmos Jump
Portable
XMAX OONT
—
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
—
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX OONT
USB-C
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX OONT
—
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Battery Type | — | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 1500mAh |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | — |
| Oven Type | Stainless Steel | — |
| Brand | AtmosRx | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | ~0.2g | — |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless Steel |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while XMAX OONT runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX OONT reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Atmos Jump takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX OONT, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the XMAX OONT uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $50 for the XMAX OONT. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX OONT charges over USB-C; the Atmos Jump uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.