Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX OONT
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
Atmos Jump and XMAX OONT are both discrete / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $50). XMAX OONT has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
19%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX OONT
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
XMAX OONT has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX OONT
$50
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
Battery Life
Atmos Jump
~30-40 minutes
XMAX OONT
12+ sessions
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX OONT
USB-C
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX OONT
~2 hours
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | — |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | AtmosRx | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while XMAX OONT runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX OONT reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Atmos Jump takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX OONT, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the XMAX OONT uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $50 for the XMAX OONT. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the XMAX OONT uses 5 preset modes. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
XMAX OONT fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of ~4 hours on the Atmos Jump.
Atmos Jump's spec sheet lists ~30-40 minutes; the XMAX OONT lists 12+ sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.