Price (USD)
Close callAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX Daboo
$49
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
Atmos Jump and XMAX Daboo are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($65 vs $49). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX Daboo
$49
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX Daboo
$49
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
Chamber Capacity
Atmos Jump
~0.2g
XMAX Daboo
N/A
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
XMAX Daboo
Internal
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
Charging
Atmos Jump
Micro USB
XMAX Daboo
USB-C
Charge Time
Atmos Jump
~4 hours
XMAX Daboo
~1 Hour
Dimensions
Atmos Jump
145x17mm
XMAX Daboo
166.5x38.5x22mm
Power Adjustment
Atmos Jump
Modular
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
Brand
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx
XMAX Daboo
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $49 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | N/A |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | ~1 Hour |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | 166.5x38.5x22mm |
| Weight | — | ~231g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | AtmosRx | XMAX |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Session Style | Session | Both |
| Warranty | 1 year | 6 months |
| Water Filtration | — | Yes |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 26 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $65 for the Atmos Jump versus $49 for the XMAX Daboo. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the XMAX Daboo uses modular - 3 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Atmos Jump lists a chamber capacity of ~0.2g; the XMAX Daboo lists N/A.
XMAX Daboo fully charges in ~1 Hour, ahead of ~4 hours on the Atmos Jump.
Atmos Jump is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Daboo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX Daboo charges over USB-C; the Atmos Jump uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.