Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeAromed 4.0
$400
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $300 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Aromed 4.0
AroMed HQ-Vaporizer $400
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX $100
Aromed 4.0 and XMAX Starry V3 solve similar use-cases with different tradeoffs. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $300 below Aromed 4.0. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Aromed 4.0
$400
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $300 lower.
Aromed 4.0
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Aromed 4.0
$400
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Device Type
Aromed 4.0
Desktop
XMAX Starry V3
Portable
Heating Type
Aromed 4.0
Convection
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Temperature Range
Aromed 4.0
60°C - 235°C (140°F - 455°F)
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Battery Type
Aromed 4.0
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Charging
Aromed 4.0
N/A
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
Aromed 4.0
Digital Control
XMAX Starry V3
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Aromed 4.0
Glass
XMAX Starry V3
Ceramic
Brand
Aromed 4.0
AroMed HQ-Vaporizer
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX
Country of Manufacture
Aromed 4.0
Germany
XMAX Starry V3
China
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Aromed 4.0 | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $400 | $100 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 60°C - 235°C (140°F - 455°F) | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | N/A | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Brand | AroMed HQ-Vaporizer | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Element | Halogen Bulb | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | On-Demand | Session |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Starry V3 sits at $100 while the Aromed 4.0 is $400, a gap of about $300 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Starry V3 is the cheaper option at $100 compared with $400 for the Aromed 4.0, about $300 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Aromed 4.0 uses convection heating, while the XMAX Starry V3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Starry V3 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Aromed 4.0 is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
XMAX Starry V3 uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Aromed 4.0 has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Aromed 4.0 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.