Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeArizer Solo 3
$345
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $256 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 3
Arizer $345
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Arizer Solo 3 and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $256 below Arizer Solo 3. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 3
$345
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $256 lower.
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 3
$345
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 3
50°C-220°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Solo 3
0.1g - 0.2g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Life
Arizer Solo 3
~3 hours
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
Arizer Solo 3
~3 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Arizer Solo 3
130x49x32mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo 3
Digital
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
Arizer Solo 3
Glass
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 3 | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $345 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~15 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.1g - 0.2g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 130x49x32mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 280g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Both | — |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the Arizer Solo 3 is $345, a gap of about $256 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $345 for the Arizer Solo 3, about $256 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Arizer Solo 3 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the XMAX QOMO takes ~20 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the Arizer Solo 3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Solo 3 uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Solo 3 controls heat with digital, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Arizer Solo 3 gives you finer per-degree control.
Arizer Solo 3 lists a chamber capacity of 0.1g - 0.2g; the XMAX QOMO lists 0.15g.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of ~3 hours on the Arizer Solo 3.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.