Price (USD)
XMAX OONT edgeArizer Solo 3
$345
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $295 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 3
Arizer $345
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
Arizer Solo 3 and XMAX OONT are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX OONT is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $295 below Arizer Solo 3. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 3
$345
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $295 lower.
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 3
$345
XMAX OONT
$50
Heating Type
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 3
50°C-220°C
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Arizer Solo 3
Internal
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Life
Arizer Solo 3
~3 hours
XMAX OONT
12+ sessions
Charge Time
Arizer Solo 3
~3 hours
XMAX OONT
~2 hours
Dimensions
Arizer Solo 3
130x49x32mm
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo 3
Digital
XMAX OONT
5 Preset Modes
Chamber Material
Arizer Solo 3
Glass
XMAX OONT
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 3 | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $345 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~15 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.1g - 0.2g | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 130x49x32mm | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Weight | 280g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | Arizer | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | Both | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX OONT sits at $50 while the Arizer Solo 3 is $345, a gap of about $295 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX OONT is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $345 for the Arizer Solo 3, about $295 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Arizer Solo 3 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the XMAX OONT takes ~20 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the Arizer Solo 3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Solo 3 uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX OONT uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Solo 3 controls heat with digital, while the XMAX OONT uses 5 preset modes. Arizer Solo 3 gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX OONT fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of ~3 hours on the Arizer Solo 3.
XMAX OONT is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Arizer Solo 3 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.