Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius edgeArizer Solo 3
$345
AUXO Celsius
$250
AUXO Celsius is typically around $95 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Arizer Solo 3
AUXO Celsius
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 3 and AUXO Celsius are both portable / hybrid vaporizers, but they target different priorities. AUXO Celsius is usually the lower-cost pick at $250, around $95 below Arizer Solo 3. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
11%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 3
$345
AUXO Celsius
$250
AUXO Celsius is typically around $95 lower.
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 3
$345
AUXO Celsius
$250
Heating Type
Arizer Solo 3
Hybrid
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
Heat Up Time
Arizer Solo 3
~15 seconds
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 3
50°C-220°C
AUXO Celsius
—
Battery Capacity
Arizer Solo 3
—
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
Battery Life
Arizer Solo 3
~3 hours
AUXO Celsius
—
Charge Time
Arizer Solo 3
—
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo 3
Digital
AUXO Celsius
Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)
Oven Type
Arizer Solo 3
—
AUXO Celsius
Quarts
Brand
Arizer Solo 3
Arizer
AUXO Celsius
AUXO
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 3 | AUXO Celsius |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $345 | $250 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) |
| Heat Up Time | ~15 seconds | 6-30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | — |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hours |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) |
| Oven Type | — | Quarts |
| Brand | Arizer | AUXO |
| App Support | — | Yes |
| Battery Tech | — | Lithium-ion |
| Capacity | — | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Mouthpiece Material | — | Zirconia |
| Primary Case Material | — | Aluminum Alloy |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Solo 3 runs hybrid while AUXO Celsius runs hybrid (primarily conduction). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
AUXO Celsius is the cheaper option at $250 compared with $345 for the Arizer Solo 3, about $95 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Arizer Solo 3 uses hybrid heating, while the AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Heat-up times are very close: ~15 seconds on the Arizer Solo 3 and 6-30 seconds on the AUXO Celsius. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The Arizer Solo 3 is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Arizer Solo 3 is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 19 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 17, an overlap of about 11%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.