Price (USD)
PAX Plus edgeArizer Extreme Q
$160
PAX Plus
$125
PAX Plus is typically around $35 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Extreme Q
Arizer $160
PAX Plus
PAX Labs $125
Arizer Extreme Q and PAX Plus are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. PAX Plus is usually the lower-cost pick at $125, around $35 below Arizer Extreme Q. PAX Plus has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
PAX Plus
$125
PAX Plus is typically around $35 lower.
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
PAX Plus has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
PAX Plus
91 grams
PAX Plus is the lighter listed unit.
Arizer Extreme Q
Convection
PAX Plus
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Extreme Q
$160
PAX Plus
$125
Device Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Desktop
PAX Plus
Portable
Heating Type
Arizer Extreme Q
Convection
PAX Plus
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Arizer Extreme Q
2-3 minutes
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Extreme Q
50°C-250°C
PAX Plus
360°F - 420°F
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Extreme Q
~0.7g
PAX Plus
0.25g - 0.5g
Battery Type
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
PAX Plus
Internal 18650
Charging
Arizer Extreme Q
N/A
PAX Plus
Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes
Dimensions
Arizer Extreme Q
160x160x65mm
PAX Plus
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
Arizer Extreme Q
442g
PAX Plus
91 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Extreme Q | PAX Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $160 | $125 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 2-3 minutes | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-250°C | 360°F - 420°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.7g | 0.25g - 0.5g |
| Battery Type | N/A | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 3300mAh (internal) |
| Battery Life | — | 2+ hours |
| Charging | N/A | Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes |
| Charge Time | — | 2-3 hours |
| Dimensions | 160x160x65mm | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | 442g | 91 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Stealth, Efficiency, Flavor, Boost modes |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | — | Supports concentrate insert (Complete Kit) |
| Brand | Arizer | PAX Labs |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2022 |
| Remote Control | Yes | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 3 years | 10 years |
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. Arizer Extreme Q is a desktop, PAX Plus is a portable. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
PAX Plus is the cheaper option at $125 compared with $160 for the Arizer Extreme Q, about $35 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
PAX Plus reaches session-ready temperature in <30 seconds, while the Arizer Extreme Q takes 2-3 minutes. That's roughly 120 seconds quicker on the PAX Plus, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Extreme Q uses convection heating, while the PAX Plus uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Extreme Q has the larger chamber at ~0.7g, versus 0.25g - 0.5g on the PAX Plus. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
PAX Plus is the lighter unit at 91 grams, around 351g less than the Arizer Extreme Q at 442g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
PAX Plus is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Arizer Extreme Q is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.