Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeArizer Air SE
$90
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Air SE
Arizer $90
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
Arizer Air SE and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $40 below Arizer Air SE. XMAX V3 Nano has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
19%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Air SE
$90
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $40 lower.
Arizer Air SE
~1 minute
XMAX V3 Nano
30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Air SE
Hybrid
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Air SE
$90
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
Arizer Air SE
Hybrid
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heat Up Time
Arizer Air SE
~1 minute
XMAX V3 Nano
30 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Air SE
180°C-210°C
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Air SE
~0.25 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
~0.1g
Battery Type
Arizer Air SE
Swappable 18650
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Life
Arizer Air SE
~80 minutes
XMAX V3 Nano
5-6 sessions
Charging
Arizer Air SE
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Arizer Air SE
Preset - 5 Stages
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Chamber Material
Arizer Air SE
Glass
XMAX V3 Nano
Stainless steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Air SE | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | ~1 minute | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-210°C | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25 grams | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | Swappable 18650 | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~80 minutes | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Preset - 5 Stages | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Stainless steel |
| Brand | Arizer | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Air SE runs hybrid while XMAX V3 Nano runs hybrid (primarily convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $90 for the Arizer Air SE, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX V3 Nano reaches session-ready temperature in 30 seconds, while the Arizer Air SE takes ~1 minute. That's roughly 30 seconds quicker on the XMAX V3 Nano, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Air SE uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Air SE has the larger chamber at ~0.25 grams, versus ~0.1g on the XMAX V3 Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Arizer Air SE uses swappable 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX V3 Nano has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Arizer Air SE's spec sheet lists ~80 minutes; the XMAX V3 Nano lists 5-6 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.