Price (USD)
Close callArizer Air SE
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Air SE
Arizer $90
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Arizer Air SE and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($90 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Air SE
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Arizer Air SE
~1 minute
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Air SE
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Air SE
$90
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Arizer Air SE
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Arizer Air SE
~1 minute
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Air SE
180°C-210°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Air SE
~0.25 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Arizer Air SE
Swappable 18650
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Life
Arizer Air SE
~80 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Arizer Air SE
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Arizer Air SE
Preset - 5 Stages
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
Arizer Air SE
Glass
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Air SE | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $90 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~1 minute | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-210°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Swappable 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~80 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Preset - 5 Stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Heating Element | Ceramic | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Air SE runs hybrid while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Arizer Air SE takes ~1 minute. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Air SE uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Air SE has the larger chamber at ~0.25 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $90 for the Arizer Air SE versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Arizer Air SE uses swappable 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Arizer Air SE's spec sheet lists ~80 minutes; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.