Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $320 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AirVape Enso and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $320 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $320 lower.
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
XMAX Starry V3
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX Starry V3
—
Heat Up Time
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
XMAX Starry V3
—
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charging
AirVape Enso
USB-C
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (25 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $420 | $100 |
| Device Type diff | Portable Desktop | — |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | 180°C-330°C | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity diff | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | — |
| Battery Type diff | Removable Proprietary Battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity diff | 5000mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life diff | 2 hours | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging diff | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time diff | 3.5 hours | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | — | Yes |
| Dimensions diff | 33x12cm | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight diff | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | Single Knob | — |
| Brand diff | Apollo AirVape | — |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Display Type diff | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Stainless Steel | — |
| Primary Build Material Body diff | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Replaceable Battery diff | — | Yes |
| Water Capacity diff | 200mL | — |
| Water Cooling Filtration diff | Yes | — |
Neither is universally better. AirVape Enso fits some priorities, while XMAX Starry V3 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX Starry V3 is listed lower ($100) compared with AirVape Enso ($420), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.