Price (USD)
XMAX Starry 4 edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $321 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AirVape Enso
XMAX Starry 4
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso and XMAX Starry 4 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry 4 is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $321 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $321 lower.
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
XMAX Starry 4
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX Starry 4
—
Heat Up Time
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
XMAX Starry 4
—
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX Starry 4
18650
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX Starry 4
2550mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
XMAX Starry 4
—
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
XMAX Starry 4
—
Pass-Through Charging
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX Starry 4
Yes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | — |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | — |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 2550mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | — |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | — |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Primary Build Material Body | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Cooling Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Starry 4 sits at $99 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $321 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Starry 4 is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $321 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Yes, only the XMAX Starry 4 supports pass-through charging. The AirVape Enso has to finish charging before you can use it.
Only the AirVape Enso supports concentrates out of the box. The XMAX Starry 4 is dry-herb-only by design.
XMAX Starry 4 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the AirVape Enso is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 24, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.