Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $331 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape $420
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
AirVape Enso and XMAX QOMO are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $331 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
16%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $331 lower.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX QOMO
$89
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX QOMO
Portable
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
AirVape Enso
33x12cm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
AirVape Enso
Single Knob
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | XMAX |
| Body Material | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $331 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $331 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AirVape Enso has the larger chamber at 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup), versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
AirVape Enso is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the XMAX QOMO is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
AirVape Enso uses removable proprietary battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3.5 hours on the AirVape Enso.
AirVape Enso's spec sheet lists 2 hours; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.