Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $331 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AirVape Enso
XMAX QOMO
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso and XMAX QOMO are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $331 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $331 lower.
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
XMAX QOMO
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX QOMO
$89
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating Type
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
—
Heat Up Time
AirVape Enso
—
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
XMAX QOMO
—
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX QOMO
—
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | — |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | — |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | — |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | — |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Primary Build Material Body | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Cooling Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $331 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $331 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Only the AirVape Enso supports concentrates out of the box. The XMAX QOMO is dry-herb-only by design.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 3.5 hours on the AirVape Enso.
AirVape Enso's spec sheet lists 2 hours; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
AirVape Enso covers 180°C-330°C, a wider band than the XMAX QOMO at 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.