Price (USD)
XMAX OONT edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $370 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape $420
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
AirVape Enso and XMAX OONT are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX OONT is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $370 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $370 lower.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX OONT
$50
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX OONT
Portable
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
XMAX OONT
12+ sessions
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
XMAX OONT
~2 hours
Dimensions
AirVape Enso
33x12cm
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
Power Adjustment
AirVape Enso
Single Knob
XMAX OONT
5 Preset Modes
Chamber Material
AirVape Enso
Ceramic
XMAX OONT
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | — |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | XMAX |
| Body Material | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX OONT sits at $50 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $370 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX OONT is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $370 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AirVape Enso is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the XMAX OONT is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
AirVape Enso uses removable proprietary battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX OONT has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
XMAX OONT fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of 3.5 hours on the AirVape Enso.
XMAX OONT is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the AirVape Enso is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
AirVape Enso's spec sheet lists 2 hours; the XMAX OONT lists 12+ sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.