Price (USD)
XMAX Daboo edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $371 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape $420
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
AirVape Enso and XMAX Daboo are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Daboo is usually the lower-cost pick at $49, around $371 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
29
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $371 lower.
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
XMAX Daboo
~231g
XMAX Daboo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Daboo
$49
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX Daboo
Portable
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
XMAX Daboo
N/A
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX Daboo
Internal
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
XMAX Daboo
~1 Hour
Dimensions
AirVape Enso
33x12cm
XMAX Daboo
166.5x38.5x22mm
Weight
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
XMAX Daboo
~231g
Power Adjustment
AirVape Enso
Single Knob
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $49 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | N/A |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | ~1 Hour |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | 166.5x38.5x22mm |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | ~231g |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | XMAX |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Body Material | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 6 months |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Filtration | Yes | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Daboo sits at $49 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $371 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Daboo is the cheaper option at $49 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $371 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Daboo is the lighter unit at ~231g, around 2319g less than the AirVape Enso at 2.55 kg. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
AirVape Enso is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the XMAX Daboo is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
AirVape Enso uses removable proprietary battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX Daboo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
AirVape Enso lists a chamber capacity of 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup); the XMAX Daboo lists N/A.
XMAX Daboo fully charges in ~1 Hour, ahead of 3.5 hours on the AirVape Enso.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.