Price (USD)
PAX 3 edgeAirVape Enso
$420
PAX 3
$250
PAX 3 is typically around $170 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AirVape Enso and PAX 3 are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. PAX 3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $250, around $170 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
PAX 3
$250
PAX 3 is typically around $170 lower.
AirVape Enso
—
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AirVape Enso
2.55 kg
PAX 3
~93 grams
PAX 3 is the lighter listed unit.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
PAX 3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
PAX 3
$250
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
PAX 3
Portable
Heat Up Time
AirVape Enso
—
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
PAX 3
—
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
PAX 3
3500mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
PAX 3
—
Charging
AirVape Enso
USB-C
PAX 3
—
Charge Time
AirVape Enso
3.5 hours
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (20 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AirVape Enso | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $420 | $250 |
| Device Type diff | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | 180°C-330°C | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Type diff | Removable Proprietary Battery | — |
| Battery Capacity diff | 5000mAh | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life diff | 2 hours | — |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | 3.5 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App diff | — | Yes |
| Dimensions diff | 33x12cm | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight diff | 2.55 kg | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Single Knob | Modular - 4 stages |
| Brand diff | Apollo AirVape | PAX Labs |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Stainless Steel | — |
| Primary Build Material Body diff | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Water Capacity diff | 200mL | — |
| Water Cooling Filtration diff | Yes | — |
Neither is universally better. AirVape Enso fits some priorities, while PAX 3 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
PAX 3 is listed lower ($250) compared with AirVape Enso ($420), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.