Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edge2-Con
$169
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $80 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
2-Con
End Game Labs $169
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
2-Con and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $80 below 2-Con. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
2-Con
$169
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $80 lower.
2-Con
~60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
2-Con
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
2-Con
$169
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
2-Con
Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
2-Con
~60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
2-Con
32°F-455°F
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
2-Con
up to 1g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
2-Con
Swappable 21700
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
2-Con
4000mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Power Adjustment
2-Con
Digital Control
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
2-Con
Glass
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
2-Con
End Game Labs
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | 2-Con | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $169 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 32°F-455°F | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | up to 1g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Swappable 21700 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 4000mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | End Game Labs | XMAX |
| Body Material | 6061 Aviation Aluminum Chasis | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Joint Size | 14mm / 18mm | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: 2-Con runs hybrid while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $169 for the 2-Con, about $80 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the 2-Con takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
2-Con uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
2-Con has the larger chamber at up to 1g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
2-Con uses swappable 21700, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
2-Con controls heat with digital control, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. 2-Con gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.