Price (USD)
Close callXMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Lanza
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
XMAX V3 Nano
XVape Lanza
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX V3 Nano and XVape Lanza are both budget / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($50 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Lanza
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XVape Lanza
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heating Type
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
Conduction
Heat Up Time
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
XVape Lanza
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
Battery Type
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
XVape Lanza
—
Charging
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
USB-C
Charge Time
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
XVape Lanza
—
Width
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
XVape Lanza
—
Height
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
XVape Lanza
—
Weight
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XVape Lanza
—
Power Adjustment
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
Preset - 5 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX V3 Nano | XVape Lanza |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $50 | $50 |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) |
| Battery Type | Internal (non-swappable) | — |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~50 minutes | — |
| Width | 2cm | — |
| Height | 13.5cm | — |
| Weight | 50g | — |
| Power Adjustment | — | Preset - 5 Stages |
| Auto Shut Off | — | Yes |
| Capacity | ~0.1g | — |
| Chamber Material | Stainless steel | Ceramic |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Display Type | None | RGB LED Light Bar |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Heating Time | 30 seconds | — |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | V3 Nano | — |
| Run Time | 5-6 sessions | — |
| Session Time | 3 minutes | — |
| Session Timer | — | 3 / 5 minutes |
| Thickness | 2cm | — |
| Type | Hybrid (primarily convection) | — |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 23 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $50 for the XMAX V3 Nano versus $50 for the XVape Lanza. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XVape Lanza is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 23, an overlap of about 12%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.