Price (USD)
Close / ContextualXMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Lanza
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
XMAX V3 Nano and XVape Lanza are both budget / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($50 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Lanza
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XVape Lanza
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heating Type
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
Conduction
Heat Up Time
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
XVape Lanza
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
Battery Type
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
XVape Lanza
—
Charging
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
USB-C
Charge Time
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
XVape Lanza
—
Width
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
XVape Lanza
—
Height
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
XVape Lanza
—
Weight
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XVape Lanza
—
Power Adjustment
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Lanza
Preset - 5 Stages
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (23 differences, 3 overlaps)
| Specification | XMAX V3 Nano | XVape Lanza |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $50 | $50 |
| Heating Type diff | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) |
| Battery Type diff | Internal (non-swappable) | — |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time diff | ~50 minutes | — |
| Width diff | 2cm | — |
| Height diff | 13.5cm | — |
| Weight diff | 50g | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | — | Preset - 5 Stages |
| Auto Shut Off diff | — | Yes |
| Capacity diff | ~0.1g | — |
| Chamber Material diff | Stainless steel | Ceramic |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Display Type diff | None | RGB LED Light Bar |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Heating Time diff | 30 seconds | — |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | V3 Nano | — |
| Run Time diff | 5-6 sessions | — |
| Session Time diff | 3 minutes | — |
| Session Timer diff | — | 3 / 5 minutes |
| Thickness diff | 2cm | — |
| Type diff | Hybrid (primarily convection) | — |
Neither is universally better. XMAX V3 Nano fits some priorities, while XVape Lanza fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with XVape Lanza ($50), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.