Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeViVANT Ambit
$75
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $25 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
ViVANT Ambit and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / convection vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $25 below ViVANT Ambit. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
ViVANT Ambit
$75
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $25 lower.
ViVANT Ambit
~40 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
ViVANT Ambit
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
ViVANT Ambit
$75
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heat Up Time
ViVANT Ambit
~40 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
ViVANT Ambit
212-464°F
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
ViVANT Ambit
~0.25 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Battery Type
ViVANT Ambit
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
ViVANT Ambit
1500mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Battery Life
ViVANT Ambit
<10 uses
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charging
ViVANT Ambit
Micro USB
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
ViVANT Ambit
1-2 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Width
ViVANT Ambit
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (24 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | ViVANT Ambit | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $75 | $50 |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~40 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | 212-464°F | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | ~0.25 grams | — |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1500mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life diff | <10 uses | — |
| Charging diff | Micro USB | — |
| Charge Time diff | 1-2 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | — | 50g |
| Brand diff | ViVANT | — |
| Capacity diff | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Display Type diff | LCD | None |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time diff | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. ViVANT Ambit fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with ViVANT Ambit ($75), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.