Price (USD)
Close callViVANT Ambit
$75
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
ViVANT Ambit
ViVANT $75
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
ViVANT Ambit and XMAX QOMO are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($75 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
ViVANT Ambit
$75
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
ViVANT Ambit
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
ViVANT Ambit
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
ViVANT Ambit
$75
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
ViVANT Ambit
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
ViVANT Ambit
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
ViVANT Ambit
212-464°F
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
ViVANT Ambit
~0.25 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
ViVANT Ambit
1500mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
ViVANT Ambit
<10 uses
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
ViVANT Ambit
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Dimensions
ViVANT Ambit
68.3x27.9x54.8mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Chamber Material
ViVANT Ambit
Stainless Steel
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | ViVANT Ambit | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $75 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 212-464°F | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | <10 uses | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1-2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 68.3x27.9x54.8mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 93g | — |
| Power Adjustment | — | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | ViVANT | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | LCD | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: ViVANT Ambit runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the ViVANT Ambit takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
ViVANT Ambit uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
ViVANT Ambit has the larger chamber at ~0.25 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $75 for the ViVANT Ambit versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
ViVANT Ambit is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
ViVANT Ambit's spec sheet lists <10 uses; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.