Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeThe Coma
$588
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $538 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
The Coma
Vices $588
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX from $49.95
The Coma and XMAX V3 Nano are both convection / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $538 below The Coma. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
31
Different Specs
31
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
The Coma
$588
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $538 lower.
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
The Coma
$588
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
The Coma
Desktop
XMAX V3 Nano
Portable
Heating Type
The Coma
Convection (wired ball vaporizer)
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Temperature Range
The Coma
200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
The Coma
0.2g to 1.6g
XMAX V3 Nano
~0.1g
Battery Type
The Coma
None
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
The Coma
N/A
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
The Coma
N/A
XMAX V3 Nano
USB-C
Power Adjustment
The Coma
PID controller, switchable between °C and °F
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Chamber Material
The Coma
Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen
XMAX V3 Nano
Stainless steel
Lowest price
$49.95
at The Stash Shack
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Aug 27, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | The Coma | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $588 | $50 |
| Device Type | Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection (wired ball vaporizer) | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2g to 1.6g | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | None | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~1 hour |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | PID controller, switchable between °C and °F | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Titanium Macro Bowl with an Everlasting titanium screen | Stainless steel |
| Brand | Vices | XMAX |
| Coil Size | 35mm enclosed coil, wired directly to the PID | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heater Material | Titanium with an aluminium handle and heat sync hardware | — |
| Manufacturer | Vices, Brisbane Australia | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Power Options | 110V (US and Canada) or 220V (AU, UK and EU) | — |
| Release Date | 2026 | 2023 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | Session |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thermal Matrix | ~3500 mixed cut ruby corundum gems, 2 to 2.5mm | — |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | Australian Consumer Law cover, no fixed term published. Consumables excluded | 1 year |
| Water Pipe Adapter | 14mm glass joint fitted, 18mm spare included | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX V3 Nano sits at $50 while the The Coma is $588, a gap of about $538 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $588 for the The Coma, about $538 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
The Coma uses convection (wired ball vaporizer) heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
The Coma has the larger chamber at 0.2g to 1.6g, versus ~0.1g on the XMAX V3 Nano. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX V3 Nano is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the The Coma is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
The Coma controls heat with pid controller, switchable between °c and °f, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses none (fixed preset). Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
The Coma covers 200-300°C (392-572°F) recommended by Vices, a wider band than the XMAX V3 Nano at 200 - 220C (single temp setting). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.