Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeTempest
$247
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $158 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Tempest
Mad Heaters $247
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Tempest and XMAX QOMO are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $158 below Tempest. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Tempest
$247
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $158 lower.
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Tempest
$247
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Tempest
N/A
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Tempest
0.075g - 0.15g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Tempest
None
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Tempest
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Tempest
N/A
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Tempest
N/A
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Tempest
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Power Adjustment
Tempest
Manual
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Tempest | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $247 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection-heavy with some conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.075g - 0.15g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Mad Heaters | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Ball Size | 2.5mm Zirconia | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Made in China, Assembled in the UK | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX QOMO sits at $89 while the Tempest is $247, a gap of about $158 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $247 for the Tempest, about $158 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Tempest uses convection-heavy with some conduction heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX QOMO has the larger chamber at 0.15g, versus 0.075g - 0.15g on the Tempest. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Tempest controls heat with manual, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Tempest's spec sheet lists N/A; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.