Price (USD)
XMAX OONT edgeTempest
$247
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $197 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Tempest
Mad Heaters $247
XMAX OONT
XMAX $50
Tempest and XMAX OONT are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX OONT is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $197 below Tempest. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Tempest
$247
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX OONT is typically around $197 lower.
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Tempest
$247
XMAX OONT
$50
Heating Type
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
XMAX OONT
Conduction
Temperature Range
Tempest
N/A
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
Battery Type
Tempest
None
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
Battery Capacity
Tempest
N/A
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
Battery Life
Tempest
N/A
XMAX OONT
12+ sessions
Charging
Tempest
N/A
XMAX OONT
USB-C
Charge Time
Tempest
N/A
XMAX OONT
~2 hours
Power Adjustment
Tempest
Manual
XMAX OONT
5 Preset Modes
Chamber Material
Tempest
Titanium
XMAX OONT
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Tempest | XMAX OONT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $247 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection-heavy with some conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.075g - 0.15g | — |
| Battery Type | None | Internal 18500 |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | 12+ sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | — | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | 5 Preset Modes |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Stainless Steel |
| Brand | Mad Heaters | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Ball Size | 2.5mm Zirconia | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Made in China, Assembled in the UK | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | — | No |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX OONT sits at $50 while the Tempest is $247, a gap of about $197 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX OONT is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $247 for the Tempest, about $197 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Tempest uses convection-heavy with some conduction heating, while the XMAX OONT uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Tempest controls heat with manual, while the XMAX OONT uses 5 preset modes. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
XMAX OONT is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Tempest is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Tempest's spec sheet lists N/A; the XMAX OONT lists 12+ sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.