Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeSticky Brick Junior
$150
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $61 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Sticky Brick Junior
Sticky Brick Labs $150
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Sticky Brick Junior and XMAX QOMO are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $61 below Sticky Brick Junior. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Sticky Brick Junior
$150
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $61 lower.
Sticky Brick Junior
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Sticky Brick Junior
$150
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
Sticky Brick Junior
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
Sticky Brick Junior
N/A
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
Sticky Brick Junior
~0.2g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
Sticky Brick Junior
None
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
Sticky Brick Junior
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
Sticky Brick Junior
N/A
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
Sticky Brick Junior
N/A
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
Sticky Brick Junior
N/A
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
Sticky Brick Junior
114x76x25mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Sticky Brick Junior | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | None | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | N/A | USB-C |
| Charge Time | N/A | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 114x76x25mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 190g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Sticky Brick Labs | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | United States (USA) | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
| Session Style | On-Demand | — |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Sticky Brick Junior runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $150 for the Sticky Brick Junior, about $61 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Sticky Brick Junior uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Sticky Brick Junior has the larger chamber at ~0.2g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Sticky Brick Junior controls heat with manual, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Sticky Brick Junior's spec sheet lists N/A; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.