Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgePOTV Lobo
$160
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $71 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
POTV Lobo and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $71 below POTV Lobo. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
18
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
POTV Lobo
$160
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $71 lower.
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
XMAX QOMO
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
POTV Lobo
$160
XMAX QOMO
$89
Device Type
POTV Lobo
Portable
XMAX QOMO
—
Heating Type
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
XMAX QOMO
—
Heat Up Time
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Battery Type
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
XMAX QOMO
—
Battery Capacity
POTV Lobo
—
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
POTV Lobo
—
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
POTV Lobo
—
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
POTV Lobo
8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D
XMAX QOMO
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (17 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | POTV Lobo | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $160 | $89 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Dynamic Hybrid | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | 160-221°C (320-430°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Battery Type diff | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) | — |
| Battery Capacity diff | — | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life diff | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time diff | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions diff | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D | — |
| Weight diff | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | Digital (LCD) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Brand diff | Planet of the Vapes | — |
| Battery Runtime diff | Up to ~10 sessions per charge | — |
| Concentrates diff | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) | — |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Warranty diff | 2 years through POTV | — |
Neither is universally better. POTV Lobo fits some priorities, while XMAX QOMO fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX QOMO is listed lower ($89) compared with POTV Lobo ($160), but live retailer pricing can change.
XMAX QOMO has the faster listed heat-up time (~20 seconds) versus POTV Lobo (~40 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.