Price (USD)
Linx Hypnos Zero edgeLinx Hypnos Zero
$80
Utillian 722
$170
Linx Hypnos Zero is typically around $90 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Hypnos Zero
Linx Vapor $80
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
Linx Hypnos Zero and Utillian 722 are both portable / discrete vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Hypnos Zero is usually the lower-cost pick at $80, around $90 below Utillian 722. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Hypnos Zero
$80
Utillian 722
$170
Linx Hypnos Zero is typically around $90 lower.
Linx Hypnos Zero
46g
Utillian 722
180g
Linx Hypnos Zero is the lighter listed unit.
Linx Hypnos Zero
Conduction
Utillian 722
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Hypnos Zero
$80
Utillian 722
$170
Heating Type
Linx Hypnos Zero
Conduction
Utillian 722
Convection
Chamber Capacity
Linx Hypnos Zero
~0.1 gram
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
Battery Type
Linx Hypnos Zero
Removable 510-thread
Utillian 722
Internal
Battery Capacity
Linx Hypnos Zero
650mAh
Utillian 722
2300mAh
Charge Time
Linx Hypnos Zero
1-2 hours
Utillian 722
~2 hours
Weight
Linx Hypnos Zero
46g
Utillian 722
180g
Power Adjustment
Linx Hypnos Zero
Modular Control - 4 stages
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
Chamber Material
Linx Hypnos Zero
Ceramic
Utillian 722
Stainless Steel
Brand
Linx Hypnos Zero
Linx Vapor
Utillian 722
Utillian
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Hypnos Zero | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $80 | $170 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 180°C - 225°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.1 gram | <0.4 grams |
| Battery Type | Removable 510-thread | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 650mAh | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | — | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | 1-2 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | — | 111x58x28mm |
| Height | 10cm | — |
| Weight | 46g | 180g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular Control - 4 stages | Modular - 5 stage |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Utillian |
| Release Date | 2017 | — |
| Session Style | On-Demand | Session |
| Thread Type | 510 Thread | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Hypnos Zero runs conduction while Utillian 722 runs convection. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Linx Hypnos Zero is the cheaper option at $80 compared with $170 for the Utillian 722, about $90 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Hypnos Zero uses conduction heating, while the Utillian 722 uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Utillian 722 has the larger chamber at <0.4 grams, versus ~0.1 gram on the Linx Hypnos Zero. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Linx Hypnos Zero is the lighter unit at 46g, around 134g less than the Utillian 722 at 180g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Hypnos Zero uses removable 510-thread, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Utillian 722 has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Linx Hypnos Zero fully charges in 1-2 hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the Utillian 722.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.