Price (USD)
XVape Aria edgeLinx Eden
$100
XVape Aria
$60
XVape Aria is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XVape Aria
XVape $60
Linx Eden and XVape Aria are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XVape Aria is usually the lower-cost pick at $60, around $40 below Linx Eden. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
16%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XVape Aria
$60
XVape Aria is typically around $40 lower.
Linx Eden
116 grams
XVape Aria
135 grams
Linx Eden is the lighter listed unit.
Linx Eden
Convection
XVape Aria
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XVape Aria
$60
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XVape Aria
Conduction
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XVape Aria
100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F)
Battery Type
Linx Eden
Internal
XVape Aria
Internal 18650
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XVape Aria
2600mAh
Charge Time
Linx Eden
3 - 4 hours
XVape Aria
2 - 3 hours
Dimensions
Linx Eden
24 x 130mm
XVape Aria
118x34x22mm
Weight
Linx Eden
116 grams
XVape Aria
135 grams
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XVape Aria
Digital
Chamber Material
Linx Eden
Ceramic & Quartz
XVape Aria
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XVape Aria |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $60 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 4 - 8 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | 2 - 3 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | 118x34x22mm |
| Weight | 116 grams | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | Ceramic |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XVape |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Eden runs convection while XVape Aria runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XVape Aria is the cheaper option at $60 compared with $100 for the Linx Eden, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Eden uses convection heating, while the XVape Aria uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Linx Eden is the lighter unit at 116 grams, around 19g less than the XVape Aria at 135 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Eden controls heat with 4 preset modes, while the XVape Aria uses digital. XVape Aria gives you finer per-degree control.
XVape Aria fully charges in 2 - 3 hours, ahead of 3 - 4 hours on the Linx Eden.
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 21, an overlap of about 16%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.