Price (USD)
XVape Aria edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XVape Aria
$60
XVape Aria is typically around $200 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
XVape Aria
XVape $60
Linx Apollo and XVape Aria are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XVape Aria is usually the lower-cost pick at $60, around $200 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
15%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$260
XVape Aria
$60
XVape Aria is typically around $200 lower.
Linx Apollo
150 grams
XVape Aria
135 grams
XVape Aria is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XVape Aria
$60
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XVape Aria
100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F)
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
XVape Aria
Internal 18650
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
XVape Aria
4 - 8 sessions
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
XVape Aria
2 - 3 hours
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
XVape Aria
118x34x22mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
XVape Aria
135 grams
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XVape Aria
Digital
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
XVape Aria
Ceramic
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
XVape Aria
XVape
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XVape Aria |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $60 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | 4 - 8 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | 2 - 3 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 118x34x22mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XVape |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | No |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XVape Aria sits at $60 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $200 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XVape Aria is the cheaper option at $60 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $200 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XVape Aria is the lighter unit at 135 grams, around 15g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the XVape Aria uses digital. XVape Aria gives you finer per-degree control.
XVape Aria fully charges in 2 - 3 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
XVape Aria is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the XVape Aria lists 4 - 8 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.