Price (USD)
XMAX Tunke edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX Tunke is typically around $210 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs XMAX Tunke
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
XMAX Tunke
XMAX $50
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and XMAX Tunke are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Tunke is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $210 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
Portable Concentrates Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX Tunke
$50
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XMAX Tunke
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
XMAX Tunke
650mAh
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
XMAX Tunke
USB-C
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX Tunke
Modular - 5 Stages
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
XMAX Tunke
XMAX
Warranty
Linx Apollo
1 year
XMAX Tunke
6 months
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You value how the Linx Apollo balances size, controls, and everyday practicality.
Choose XMAX Tunke if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($50 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and conduction sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
19 differ 4 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX Tunke |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Modular - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Quartz |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Session Time | — | 15 seconds |
| Warranty | 1 year | 6 months |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Tunke?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Tunke sits at $50 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $210 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Tunke?
XMAX Tunke is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $210 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I use concentrates with the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Tunke?
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
Which uses USB-C, the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Tunke?
XMAX Tunke charges over USB-C; the Linx Apollo uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
How similar are the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Tunke?
Across the 23 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 19, an overlap of about 17%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.