Price (USD)
ViVANT DAbOX edgeLinx Apollo
$260
ViVANT DAbOX
$65
ViVANT DAbOX is typically around $195 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs ViVANT DAbOX
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
ViVANT DAbOX
ViVANT $65
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and ViVANT DAbOX are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. ViVANT DAbOX is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $195 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
14
Shared Specs
6
Overall Overlap
30%
Shared Traits
Portable Concentrates Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
ViVANT DAbOX
$65
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
ViVANT DAbOX
N/A
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
ViVANT DAbOX
0.1g - 0.2g
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
ViVANT DAbOX
1500mAh
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
ViVANT DAbOX
6.5 x 4.9 x 2.2 cm
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
ViVANT DAbOX
Fixed (40W)
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
ViVANT DAbOX
Glass
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
ViVANT DAbOX
ViVANT
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You value how the Linx Apollo balances size, controls, and everyday practicality.
Choose ViVANT DAbOX if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($65 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
14 differ 6 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | ViVANT DAbOX |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $65 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | 10 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | N/A |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.1g - 0.2g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 6.5 x 4.9 x 2.2 cm |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Fixed (40W) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Glass |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | ViVANT |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Session Style | — | On-Demand |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the ViVANT DAbOX?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the ViVANT DAbOX sits at $65 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $195 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the ViVANT DAbOX?
ViVANT DAbOX is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $195 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and ViVANT DAbOX hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the ViVANT DAbOX lists 0.1g - 0.2g.
Can I use concentrates with the Linx Apollo or the ViVANT DAbOX?
Both devices support concentrate use, typically via an included or aftermarket pad or insert. Check the manual for the recommended approach for each.
How similar are the Linx Apollo and the ViVANT DAbOX?
Across the 20 specs we line up, they share 6 and differ on 14, an overlap of about 30%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.