Price (USD)
Vapman Click edgeLinx Apollo
$190
Vapman Click
$119
Vapman Click is typically around $71 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
Vapman Click
Vapman $119
Linx Apollo and Vapman Click are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Vapman Click is usually the lower-cost pick at $119, around $71 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$190
Vapman Click
$119
Vapman Click is typically around $71 lower.
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Vapman Click
~50g (kit)
Vapman Click is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$190
Vapman Click
$119
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Vapman Click
Set by flame, bimetallic click back at 180°C (356°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Vapman Click
0.05g - 0.2g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Vapman Click
None
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Vapman Click
N/A
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Vapman Click
N/A
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Vapman Click
N/A
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Vapman Click
N/A
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Vapman Click
70 x 45mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Vapman Click
~50g (kit)
Typical price
$119
Sold by VapeFully
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Vapman Click |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $190 | $119 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Hybrid (conduction and convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~5 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | Set by flame, bimetallic click back at 180°C (356°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.05g - 0.2g |
| Battery Type | Internal | None |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | N/A |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | N/A |
| Charging | Micro USB | N/A |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | N/A |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 70 x 45mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | ~50g (kit) |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Manual (flame length) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | 24k gold plated copper |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Yes, with the Vapman concentrate screen |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Vapman |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | — | Italy |
| Heat Source | — | Butane jet lighter (not included) |
| Manufacturer | — | INHALE |
| Mouthpiece Material | — | Black POM with inox helix spiral, or wood |
| Release Date | — | 2024 |
| Session Style | — | On-Demand |
| Warranty | 1 year | 2 years |
The biggest practical difference is portability: the Vapman Click is roughly 100g lighter than the Linx Apollo, which adds up over a day of pocket carry.
Vapman Click is the cheaper option at $119 compared with $190 for the Linx Apollo, about $71 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Vapman Click is the lighter unit at ~50g (kit), around 100g less than the Linx Apollo at 150 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the Vapman Click uses manual (flame length). Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Vapman Click lists 0.05g - 0.2g.
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the Vapman Click lists N/A. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Vapman Click is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.