Price (USD)
Utillian 722 edgeLinx Apollo
$260
Utillian 722
$170
Utillian 722 is typically around $90 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
Utillian 722
Utillian $170
Linx Apollo and Utillian 722 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Utillian 722 is usually the lower-cost pick at $170, around $90 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
20%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$260
Utillian 722
$170
Utillian 722 is typically around $90 lower.
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Utillian 722
180g
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
Utillian 722
$170
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Utillian 722
180°C - 225°C
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Utillian 722
<0.4 grams
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Utillian 722
2300mAh
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Utillian 722
~60 minutes
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Utillian 722
~2 hours
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Utillian 722
111x58x28mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Utillian 722
180g
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
Utillian 722
Modular - 5 stage
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
Utillian 722
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Utillian 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $170 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 180°C - 225°C |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | <0.4 grams |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2300mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro-USB |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | ~2 hours |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 111x58x28mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | 180g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Modular - 5 stage |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Utillian |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 16 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Utillian 722 is the cheaper option at $170 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $90 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 30g less than the Utillian 722 at 180g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Utillian 722 lists <0.4 grams.
Utillian 722 fully charges in ~2 hours, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Utillian 722 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Linx Apollo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the Utillian 722 lists ~60 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.