Price (USD)
Linx Apollo edgeLinx Apollo
$190
Tafee Flaske
$567
Linx Apollo is typically around $377 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
Tafee Flaske
Tafee $567
Linx Apollo and Tafee Flaske are both portable / concentrates vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Linx Apollo is usually the lower-cost pick at $190, around $377 below Tafee Flaske. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Apollo
$190
Tafee Flaske
$567
Linx Apollo is typically around $377 lower.
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Tafee Flaske
226 grams
Linx Apollo is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$190
Tafee Flaske
$567
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
Tafee Flaske
Up to 260°C (500°F)
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
Tafee Flaske
~0.10g per ceramic pot
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
Tafee Flaske
21700 lithium-ion (user replaceable)
Battery Capacity
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Tafee Flaske
5000mAh
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
~10 sessions
Tafee Flaske
Multiple sessions per charge, recharge every 4 to 6 pots
Charging
Linx Apollo
Micro USB
Tafee Flaske
USB-C, Quick Charge 3.0
Charge Time
Linx Apollo
3-4 hours
Tafee Flaske
~90 minutes
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
Tafee Flaske
110 x 82.5 x 28mm
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Tafee Flaske
226 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Apollo | Tafee Flaske |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $190 | $567 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Pure convection, breath sensing |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~1 second, on demand |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | Up to 260°C (500°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | ~0.10g per ceramic pot |
| Battery Type | Internal | 21700 lithium-ion (user replaceable) |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 5000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | Multiple sessions per charge, recharge every 4 to 6 pots |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C, Quick Charge 3.0 |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | 110 x 82.5 x 28mm |
| Weight | 150 grams | 226 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Five preset power levels (Soft, Low, Medium, High, Max) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Food grade ceramic oven pots with stainless steel screens |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | Ceramic pots are rated for loose leaf and extracts |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | Tafee |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | No (isolated air path with low resistance) |
| Country of Manufacture | — | Canada |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | Tafee Technologies Corporation, Burlington, Ontario |
| Pot Vault | — | Stores two preloaded ceramic pots in the body |
| Release Date | — | 2026 |
| Session Style | — | On-Demand |
| Warranty | 1 year | 2 years on the device, excluding mouthpieces, stem, ceramic pots and shredder |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the Linx Apollo sits at $190 while the Tafee Flaske is $567, a gap of about $377 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Linx Apollo is the cheaper option at $190 compared with $567 for the Tafee Flaske, about $377 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Linx Apollo is the lighter unit at 150 grams, around 76g less than the Tafee Flaske at 226 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Tafee Flaske uses 21700 lithium-ion (user replaceable), so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the Tafee Flaske lists ~0.10g per ceramic pot.
Tafee Flaske fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of 3-4 hours on the Linx Apollo.
Linx Apollo's spec sheet lists ~10 sessions; the Tafee Flaske lists Multiple sessions per charge, recharge every 4 to 6 pots. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.